Zero-click search, SEO, and the future of your marketing strategy

November 21, 2024
0 minute read

Here in Colorado, the City and County of Denver spends a little more than half of the year conducting residential street sweepings. To facilitate this, cars parked on public roadways during designated sweeping times are slapped with a $50 citation. As someone who both lives in Denver and doesn’t enjoy paying fines, I try my best to stay on top of the sweeping schedule.


I say this because, recently, I searched “what day does street sweeping end in Denver” to see when I was free to begin parking a little less diligently. Google returned results from the City, local news stations, and even Reddit — but I didn’t actually click on any of them. The AI Overview, as well as a featured snippet directly beneath it, conveniently answered my question in big, bold, highlighted text.



What I just experienced is a phenomena experts are calling the “zero-click search,” and they’re a lot more common than you might expect.


What is a zero-click search?


Rand Fishkin, cofounder of SparkToro, among other ventures, has been beating the zero-click drum for quite a while. In 2019, he published research showing that 50.33% of all Google searches ended without a click to any web property in the results. He found similar results the following year, then again as recently as last July.


In the United States today, 58.5% of all searches can be categorized as “zero-click” searches. Of that 58.5%, 37.1% of users don’t click on anything, while 21.4% conduct another search.


When users do click on a result, they only visit the open web 70.5% of the time. Over a quarter of clicks, 28.5%, lead to Google Maps, Images, News, YouTube, or some other Google owned property, while another 1% lead to ads.


Together, this means that, according to Fishkin’s research, “for every 1,000 searches on Google in the United States, 360 clicks make it to a non-Google-owned, non-Google-ad-paying property.”


Navigating Zero-Click Marketing

Join Rand Fishkin, Purna Virji, and Itai Sadan for an informative roundtable discussion tackling the future of organic marketing in today's zero-click landscape.

Watch the webinar


In the EU, where regulators are applying increasingly more scrutiny to the tech giants, the results aren’t very different. There, for every 1,000 Google searches, 374 clicks go to the open web. That’s only 14 more clicks than in the States.


This situation has been a concern since the very inception of the Knowledge Graph. In 2014, Google’s then head of search, Amit Singhal, attempted to assuage publishers who saw it all as little more than shameless website scraping.


Featured snippets and knowledge panels are just two of the many ways Google captures search traffic. Earlier this year, Google released their AI Overview panels, the culmination of a decade-plus effort to transform the Search Engine into an Answers Engine. Who knows what Fishkin’s research will look like next time.


What does zero-click search mean for SEO?


The rise of zero-click searches will undoubtedly have an impact on search engine optimization. What that impact looks like, however, depends entirely upon your own goals.


To start, not all zero-click searches are a bad thing! Consider my search about parking from the beginning of this article. The City and County of Denver wrote their webpage on street sweeping with the intent to spread public awareness. Google’s featured snippet, then, directly contributed towards that goal.


There’s evidence that local businesses benefit from zero-click experiences as well. Siinda, in partnership with Near Media, asked 300 German, Irish, and French consumers, split equally by country and device, to find a professional to assist them with a kitchen remodeling project.


In this high-intent scenario, 71% of all searches ended with at least one click. Their research also revealed that, when a local pack was present, Google Business Profiles drew the plurality of engagement—42% to be exact.


This behavior shouldn’t come as a surprise. Unlike my parking search, a search for local services demands action. For most agencies, this should be reason enough to continue to invest in SEO.


Note, though, that 71% figure from Siinda’s research is still less than 100%. In a survey conducted by the World Association of News Publishers, 80% of respondents claimed that their search traffic was down in 2023 compared to 2022, and 76% of all respondents claimed their traffic fell between 1% and 20% year-over-year.


Generative AI, particularly the newly announced search function embedded within ChatGPT, is unlikely to buck this trend.


Let’s process all of this data. Organic traffic is down, but search isn’t dead. Search engine optimization continues to benefit certain groups that do not rely on advertising dollars, like public agencies, nonprofits and local businesses. What do we do now?


Introducing zero-click content


Talk to anyone familiar with social media marketing and they’ll happily discuss the challenges associated with creating “zero-click content.” Instagram, an infamous example, has long refused to allow links in their posts. TikTok, another social media leader, also relegates URLs to user biographies. Snapchat doesn’t allow links at all!


The phrase “zero-click content” is another insight by SparkToro. In an article by Amanda Natividad, SparkToro opines that marketers should invest in content that “offers valuable, standalone insights..., with no need to click.”


She argues that zero-click content provides consumers with the dopamine hit immediately. Give them the absolute juiciest piece first, then lure them into the full piece of content.


Take, for example, Gianmarco Soresi, a viral comedian known for sharing snippets of his crowd work on TikTok. Among comedy circles, the rise of crowd work on social media has proven controversial, yet, in an interview for the New York Times, Soresi said “to be a stand-up comedian in today’s world, you have to be a content machine.”


A similar article by the Guardian doubles down on this point. Author Brian Logan writes “behind the [crowd work] trend is the squaring of a circle for acts who must use the internet to promote themselves, but who don’t want to ship all their best jokes for free.”


This is exactly the kind of marketing that Natividad is speaking to in her SparkToro article. Comics are posting the dopamine hit (short, sharable snippets of crowd word) to a zero-click platform (TikTok) with the intent of luring them into their show.


To combat zero-click the decline in organic traffic brought on by zero-click searches, we have to become content machines.


It’s worth reading Natividad’s entire article on the subject. We’ll also be joining Rand Fishkin, founder of SparkToro, for an exclusive webinar exploring this very topic.


Expert Neil Patel offers more technical advice for marketers on
his blog, arguing that professionals should be more judicious in the keywords that they select by avoiding optimizing for those that appear as AI Overviews or direct answers.


Traditional SEO strategies still apply, too. Agencies should continue to create high-performing websites with great Core Web Vital Scores, high levels of accessibility, and stellar content that adheres to E-E-A-T standards.


Putting it all together


It’s a weird time for organic traffic, to put it lightly. For many websites, search referrals are dropping, and the dramatic rise in AI tools isn’t poised to help.


Thankfully, with change comes opportunity. Search engine optimization continues, for the foreseeable future, to be a powerful way for businesses to drive organic traffic. Local businesses, especially, have little to worry about.


In the near future, innovative marketing strategies like SparkToro’s “zero-click content” may prove to be an exciting opportunity for cutting-edge agencies. Consider adding short, digestible, high-value to your marketing strategy in 2025. It might pay off.

Headshot of Shawn Davis

Content Writer, Duda

Denver-based writer with a passion for creating engaging, informative content. Loves running, cycling, coffee, and the New York Times' minigames.


Did you find this article interesting?


Thanks for the feedback!
By Shawn Davis April 1, 2026
Core Web Vitals aren't new, Google introduced them in 2020 and made them a ranking factor in 2021. But the questions keep coming, because the metrics keep changing and the stakes keep rising. Reddit's SEO communities were still debating their impact as recently as January 2026, and for good reason: most agencies still don't have a clear, repeatable way to measure, diagnose, and fix them for clients. This guide cuts through the noise. Here's what Core Web Vitals actually measure, what good scores look like today, and how to improve them—without needing a dedicated performance engineer on every project. What Core Web Vitals measure Google evaluates three user experience signals to determine whether a page feels fast, stable, and responsive: Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) measures how long it takes for the biggest visible element on a page — usually a hero image or headline — to load. Google considers anything under 2.5 seconds good. Above 4 seconds is poor. Interaction to Next Paint (INP) replaced First Input Delay (FID) in March 2024. Where FID measures the delay before a user's first click is registered, INP tracks the full responsiveness of every interaction across the page session. A good INP score is under 200 milliseconds. Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) measures visual stability — how much page elements unexpectedly move while content loads. A score below 0.1 is good. Higher scores signal that images, ads, or embeds are pushing content around after load, which frustrates users and tanks conversions. These three metrics are a subset of Google's broader Page Experience signals, which also include HTTPS, safe browsing, and mobile usability. Core Web Vitals are the ones you can most directly control and improve. Why your clients' scores may still be poor Core Web Vitals scores vary dramatically by platform, hosting, and how a site was built. Some of the most common culprits agencies encounter: Heavy above-the-fold content . A homepage with an autoplay video, a full-width image slider, and a chat widget loading simultaneously will fail LCP every time. The browser has to resolve all of those resources before it can paint the largest element. Unstable image dimensions . When an image loads without defined width and height attributes, the browser doesn't reserve space for it. It renders the surrounding text, then jumps it down when the image appears. That jump is CLS. Third-party scripts blocking the main thread . Analytics pixels, ad tags, and live chat tools run on the browser's main thread. When they stack up, every click and tap has to wait in line — driving INP scores up. A single slow third-party script can push an otherwise clean site into "needs improvement" territory. Too many web fonts . Each font family and weight is a separate network request. A page loading four font files before rendering any text will fail LCP, especially on mobile connections. Unoptimized images . JPEGs and PNGs served at full resolution, without compression or modern formats like WebP or AVIF, add unnecessary weight to every page load. How to measure them accurately There are two types of Core Web Vitals data you should be looking at for every client: Lab data comes from tools like Google PageSpeed Insights, Lighthouse, and WebPageTest. It simulates page loads in controlled conditions. Lab data is useful for diagnosing specific issues and testing fixes before you deploy them. Field data (also called Real User Monitoring, or RUM) comes from actual users visiting the site. Google collects this through the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) and surfaces it in Search Console and PageSpeed Insights. Field data is what Google actually uses as a ranking signal — and it often looks worse than lab data because it reflects real-world device and connection variability. If your client's site has enough traffic, you'll see field data in Search Console under Core Web Vitals. This is your baseline. Lab data helps you understand why the scores are what they are. For clients with low traffic who don't have enough field data to appear in CrUX, you'll be working primarily with lab scores. Set that expectation early so clients understand that improvements may not immediately show up in Search Console. Practical fixes that move the needle Fix LCP: get the hero image loading first The single most effective LCP improvement is adding fetchpriority="high" to the hero image tag. This tells the browser to prioritize that resource over everything else. If you're using a background CSS image for the hero, switch it to anelement — background images aren't discoverable by the browser's preload scanner. Also check whether your hosting serves images through a CDN with caching. Edge delivery dramatically reduces the time-to-first-byte, which feeds directly into LCP. Fix CLS: define dimensions for every media element Every image, video, and ad slot on the page needs explicit width and height attributes in the HTML. If you're using responsive CSS, you can still define the aspect ratio with aspect-ratio in CSS while leaving the actual size fluid. The key is giving the browser enough information to reserve space before the asset loads. Avoid inserting content above existing content after page load. This is common with cookie banners, sticky headers that change height, and dynamically loaded ad units. If you need to show these, anchor them to fixed positions so they don't push content around. Fix INP: reduce what's competing for the main thread Audit third-party scripts and defer or remove anything that isn't essential. Tools like WebPageTest's waterfall view or Chrome DevTools Performance panel show you exactly which scripts are blocking the main thread and for how long. Load chat widgets, analytics, and ad tags asynchronously and after the page's critical path has resolved. For most clients, moving non-essential scripts to load after the DOMContentLoaded event is a meaningful INP improvement with no visible impact on the user experience. For websites with heavy JavaScript — particularly those built on frameworks with large client-side bundles — consider breaking up long tasks into smaller chunks using the browser's Scheduler API or simply splitting components so the main thread isn't locked for more than 50 milliseconds at a stretch. What platforms handle automatically One of the practical advantages of building on a platform optimized for performance is that many of these fixes are applied by default. Duda, for example, automatically serves WebP images, lazy loads below-the-fold content, minifies CSS, and uses efficient cache policies for static assets. As of May 2025, 82% of sites built on Duda pass all three Core Web Vitals metrics — the highest recorded pass rate among major website platforms. That baseline matters when you're managing dozens or hundreds of client sites. It means you're starting each project close to or at a passing score, rather than diagnosing and patching a broken foundation. How much do Core Web Vitals actually affect rankings? Honestly, they're a tiebreaker — not a primary signal. Google has been clear that content quality and relevance still dominate ranking decisions. A well-optimized site with thin, irrelevant content won't outrank a content-rich competitor just because its CLS is 0.05. What Core Web Vitals do affect is the user experience that supports those rankings. Pages with poor LCP scores have measurably higher bounce rates. Sites with high CLS lose users mid-session. Those behavioral signals — time on page, return visits, conversions — are things search engines can observe and incorporate. The practical argument for fixing Core Web Vitals isn't just "because Google said so." It's that faster, more stable pages convert better. Every second of LCP improvement can reduce bounce rates by 15–20% depending on the industry and device mix. For client sites that monetize through leads or eCommerce, that's a revenue argument, not just an SEO argument. A repeatable process for agencies Audit every new site before launch. Run PageSpeed Insights and record LCP, INP, and CLS scores for both mobile and desktop. Flag anything in the "needs improvement" or "poor" range before the client sees the live site. Check Search Console monthly for existing clients. The Core Web Vitals report surfaces issues as they appear in field data. Catching a regression early — before it compounds — is significantly easier than explaining a traffic drop after the fact. Document what you've improved. Clients rarely see Core Web Vitals scores on their own. A monthly one-page performance summary showing before/after scores builds credibility and makes your technical work visible. Prioritize mobile. Google uses mobile-first indexing, and field data shows that mobile CWV scores are almost always worse than desktop. If you only have time to optimize one version, do mobile first. Core Web Vitals aren't a one-time fix. Platforms change, new scripts get added, campaigns bring in new widgets. Build the audit into your workflow and treat it like any other ongoing deliverable, and you'll stay ahead of the issues before they affect your clients' rankings. Duda's platform is built with Core Web Vitals performance in mind. Explore how it handles image optimization, script management, and site speed automatically — so your team spends less time debugging and more time building.
By Ilana Brudo March 31, 2026
Vertical SaaS must transition from tools to an AI-powered Vertical Operating System (vOS). Learn to leverage context, end tech sprawl, and maximize retention.
By Shawn Davis March 27, 2026
Automate client management, instant site generation, and data synchronization with an API-driven website builder to create a scalable growth engine for your SaaS platform.
Show More

Latest posts