Why partnering with a website builder is the right move for vertical SaaS companies

March 26, 2024
0 minute read

Vertical SaaS is a booming business


The explosion of vertical
SaaS platforms over the past decade is one of the most interesting and important innovations in the tech industry to date. There are software platforms for travel and tour experience providers.  Software platforms for yoga studios.  Software platforms for dental practices.  Heck, there are even software platforms for professional dog walkers! As more and more of these companies make their way into the market with specialized technology solutions for all kinds of verticals, one thing remains consistent across the board — none of them exist in a vacuum. 


For example, if you have a booking technology specifically designed for hairdressers, there are still many other services those customers will need that fall outside your core competency, such as digital advertising, SEO services, and (as we will discuss at length in this article) web design. Offering these additional products and services as one holistic solution provides outstanding new revenue opportunities for your company, can complement and increase the effectiveness of your main solution, and reduces churn. 


So why websites?


One of the most important components to a business’ success today is a cohesive online presence centered around a website that is specifically tailored to meet certain business objectives. 


Professional photographers not only have to be discoverable in Google search results — they also need a place to display their portfolio of work and sell their images online. Real estate agents require a way to show off property listings in an enticing way and easily capture leads in their CRM. Music venues have to sell tickets and also display upcoming performances. The single best tool for accomplishing all of these goals is undeniably a conversion-driving, information-rich website. 


And when you are a SaaS company that builds products for a specific industry vertical like the ones listed above, packaging your solution in a dynamic, modern website can increase engagement with your tool and have an incredibly positive impact on your bottom line. Now, of course, how you offer websites is entirely up to you and will heavily depend on the needs of your customers — some SaaS platforms prefer to create a do-it-yourself website-building flow, while others opt to build sites for clients themselves or outsource this work to an agency. However, in all cases, the result remains the same; offering websites to your customers is a net gain for both you and your customers. 


Your options for offering websites


For SaaS companies to serve their customer segments effectively and grow their share of wallet, they need to find ways to incorporate services like web design into their offerings without putting undue strain on their existing team or detracting from their main company mission.


So what options are open to the SaaS company looking to increase revenue, ARPU and customer stickiness? Let’s take a look…


Option #1 — Build your own solution 


On its face, this idea should make a lot of sense. After all, you’re a technology company and building software is your reason for being. However, just because you have a team filled with talented engineers and product visionaries doesn’t mean you should use the engineers and visionaries to create a website builder that serves your customers’ needs both today and in the future. 


Web design is a fast-paced industry with constant updates in design trends, shifting SEO best practices and ever-changing laws regarding cookies, privacy and user data. An expert hand is required to build and maintain a successful site builder that won’t fall far behind industry standards in just a matter of months. Your team may be able to bear this extra burden in the short term, and may even find some success if you hire enough additional hands to maintain it (which is expensive); but eventually, it’s more than likely your website builder will take up more and more of your team’s time and resources to the detriment of your core business and, ultimately, just become a distraction. Once that happens, you will be in a constant battle of resource allocation between your unique differentiators and a “me too” website platform.


Additionally, it’s important to remember that your website builder won’t be your customers only option for creating an online presence. Dedicated website builders that serve small businesses directly like Wix and Squarespace have huge engineering and marketing teams, and your in-house solution will be placed in direct competition with these platforms. In reality, maintaining your own site builder means having these huge players constantly nipping at your technology’s heels and competing for your customers. 


In our experience, many SaaS companies that decide to build their own solution sooner or later find it to be unsustainable and decide to invest in one of the following two options. 


Option #2 — Purchase a product 


An expensive option, but not a bad one, is to acquire a website builder and roll it and any new employees that are part of the package into your company. This has the obvious advantage of relieving your team of having to create an entirely new product  from scratch, but eventually could lead to many of the same ongoing maintenance issues that come with building your own solution. 


Whether you build it or buy it, if you own the product, its problems are your problems, and something as complicated as a website builder can easily eat up endless resources or be left to languish as a second tier service. Obviously, neither are particularly good outcomes.   


Option #3 — Partner with a web design platform


Unless you have endless resources to throw at creating and maintaining a cutting-edge site builder, finding a technology partner you trust to integrate with is the most cost-effective and scalable option for adding website building under your brand. The product is already built and run by a dedicated team of professionals that know the industry and can innovate on your behalf, partnerships generally don’t come with the same enormous price tag as options #1 and #2, and you’re left free to focus on your core business.


However, since partnering and integrating with a website builder means putting a fair amount of trust into the hands of a team that you don’t directly manage, it’s probably worth exploring the question, “what exactly does a good website builder partner actually look like?”


What to look for in a site builder


Every website builder has its own strengths, but not all of them will be geared towards the unique needs of SaaS companies. For example, providing users with access to advanced development features inside the site builder may be important if you’re looking to build sites in-house, but to empower your customers to build sites themselves ease-of-use for the less tech-savvy would prove more critical. 


White label 


There’s an interesting debate going on in the tech industry right now about the degree to which white labeling products (like website builders) is an advantage for SaaS companies. 


One line of thinking goes something like, “If I integrate with a product that has a good brand reputation, I can leverage that in my own marketing efforts to boost customer confidence and improve acquisition.”


This approach is not entirely without its merits. Associating your brand with a known and trusted product may appeal to a large portion of your potential audience, but it’s a double-edged sword. If customers are aware that one of your featured products is available elsewhere, it decreases the “stickiness” of your overall service, which is one of the main reasons most SaaS companies look to add an additional product in the first place. 


Advocates of white labeling products and services take a much different tack. This argument is normally along the lines of, “My customers are my customers, and if I integrate with a technology partner, I still want the focus to be entirely on my brand.”


The benefits in this case are pretty straightforward. The SaaS company reaps all of the aforementioned benefits of integrating with a website partner, and maintains total control over how their service is perceived by customers. This both increases your share of wallet without the reliance on another brand, and ensures that your main technology offering isn’t overshadowed by another product. 


When researching a website builder to integrate with, you can generally determine which approach a potential partner subscribes to by looking at their various tools and features. 


For example, Duda adheres to the idea that your customers are yours; therefore, we offer a wide range of white label features and tools on our web design platform, including:


  • Your clients’ login page
  • The website editor
  • Website preview tools
  • Automated email communications
  • Your client’s dashboard
  • Customization of the features inside the editor itself


But no matter where you come down on the white label debate, a good website partner will give you the ability to control when and where their brand appears to your customers. 


Integration-readiness


No two SaaS companies work exactly the same way, but when integrating and deploying a new product, every single one wants to go to market as quickly, and with as rich of an integration, as possible. This fact offers a bit of a challenge to website builders. We have to balance creating a scalable integration approach so we can service all of our partners effectively, and tailor our platform to meet the unique needs of our partners. 


This is why we have heavily invested in creating a well-documented, robust and
highly flexible API and advanced tools that can address a broad swath of use cases. 


For instance, let’s look at Duda’s integration with AppFolio, a CRM for property managers with the mission to enable customers to engage with their tenants, receive invoices, collect new tenant applications and manage their open properties.


Before Duda, AppFolio used WordPress Multisite to create property listings pages with structured data maintained in customer accounts on their platform, but wanted to integrate with a site builder to avoid security and scalability issues they had run into with WordPress.


AppFolio leveraged Duda’s Dynamic Pages feature and flexible API during its integration so their team could continue to generate the same type of pages on Duda. This enabled AppFolio to ensure customer websites maintain up-to-date listings data synced with their accounts and benefit from the other advantages of Duda, like a decrease in the amount of time it takes to build custom websites.

 

Custom widget creation 


Very few SaaS companies will find that a website builder fulfills their needs 100% straight out of the box. More than likely, some amount of customization will be required to integrate your technology or incorporate features that are specific to your customers needs. 


For example, if you have a proprietary booking widget as your core offering, you’ll need to give users a simple way to add it seamlessly to their websites. Likewise, there may be a service that is specific to your region or industry that absolutely must be made available to your customers for their sites to drive business value. It’s important that your chosen website builder provides an easy way to accomplish these tasks without burying your team in hardcore development work. 


Duda offers a
custom widget builder for just such an occasion. This feature provides a user-friendly interface for widget management, has a dashboard where your team can view and edit their widgets, and offers simple management tools for saving, publishing and restoring older versions. And since one of Duda’s top goals is to maximize site performance, we’ve ensured that custom widgets created in Duda are optimized for performance no matter how many widgets appear on a site or their complexity.


If you’re evaluating a website builder to integrate with and it doesn’t provide you with some mechanism for easily modifying it for your user base, it’s probably not a partnership that’s worth pursuing. 


Usability for your team & customers


Obviously, usability of a tool is always important to evaluate when deciding whether or not to integrate it into your service — but exactly what makes for “good usability” largely depends on who is using it. 


If your plan is to build sites for clients in-house, a simple drag-and-drop website builder interface that cuts down on development work isn’t enough. You’ll need key features that help foster effective team collaboration and prompt customers to engage in the site building process. 


Shareable design assets and site elements, a content collection form that can be sent to customers and site commenting tools that facilitate streamlined communication about designs all help to increase the efficiency of your team and the scalability of your site building service. 


However if you offer a do-it-yourself site building flow, features like those listed above may take a backseat to overall ease-of-use for the average small business customer and specialized roles and permissions that allow them to only access the parts of the builder necessary to make basic updates to their websites. You may even want to implement a fully guided design process, like what is available using Duda’s
Simple Editor.


Duda provides a wide variety of features that support both use cases, but to find the perfect partner, you’ll want to spend a fair amount of time thinking through just exactly what your optimal site building process will look like and the features you’ll need to make it a reality. 


Website security 


Fun fact: WordPress websites are the most hacked on the internet. In 2022, a whopping
96% of all infected websites monitored by the website security service Sucuri were created using the open source site building behemoth. This is, of course, to be somewhat expected. After all, WordPress powers more than 40% of sites on the web today. However, this fact still raises an important point for SaaS companies looking to offer websites. 


The nature of open source software makes it vulnerable to attack since WordPress core, plugins, and themes don’t uniformly update at the same time. And when software goes out of date, it exposes security holes for hackers to exploit. Simply ensuring all of your customers’ plugins are up to date can become a time-suck, and that’s before you start counting up the hours you’ll spend dealing with hacks when they occur.



It’s simply much easier for a bad actor to attack an open system like WordPress than a proprietary, cloud-based web design platform like Duda, and for SaaS companies that deal with hundreds or thousands of customers, this is a problem you can little afford to deal with.

Any site builder you choose to partner with should have a solid track record of offering secure websites with above a 99.9% uptime, DDoS protection, and free, automated HTTPS encryption. Your future self will thank you for the foresight. 



Putting it all together


Websites have been, are, and — for the foreseeable future — will remain a critical component of online success for all kinds of small businesses and industry professionals. For SaaS companies looking to incorporate web design services into their businesses, there are lots of variables to keep in mind. But broadly speaking, you can be sure that partnering with a dedicated site builder that is robust and flexible enough to seamlessly integrate into your existing workflows is a winning bet. You just need to have a clear understanding of your desired site building workflow and consider how much (if at all) you’d like to leverage your chosen partner’s brand in customer acquisition. 


For more information on partnering with a successful web design platform like Duda, simply visit duda.co/integrated-websites.



Read More About Duda for SaaS
Headshot of Shawn Davis

Content Writer, Duda

Denver-based writer with a passion for creating engaging, informative content. Loves running, cycling, coffee, and the New York Times' minigames.


Did you find this article interesting?


Thanks for the feedback!
By Shawn Davis April 1, 2026
Core Web Vitals aren't new, Google introduced them in 2020 and made them a ranking factor in 2021. But the questions keep coming, because the metrics keep changing and the stakes keep rising. Reddit's SEO communities were still debating their impact as recently as January 2026, and for good reason: most agencies still don't have a clear, repeatable way to measure, diagnose, and fix them for clients. This guide cuts through the noise. Here's what Core Web Vitals actually measure, what good scores look like today, and how to improve them—without needing a dedicated performance engineer on every project. What Core Web Vitals measure Google evaluates three user experience signals to determine whether a page feels fast, stable, and responsive: Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) measures how long it takes for the biggest visible element on a page — usually a hero image or headline — to load. Google considers anything under 2.5 seconds good. Above 4 seconds is poor. Interaction to Next Paint (INP) replaced First Input Delay (FID) in March 2024. Where FID measures the delay before a user's first click is registered, INP tracks the full responsiveness of every interaction across the page session. A good INP score is under 200 milliseconds. Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) measures visual stability — how much page elements unexpectedly move while content loads. A score below 0.1 is good. Higher scores signal that images, ads, or embeds are pushing content around after load, which frustrates users and tanks conversions. These three metrics are a subset of Google's broader Page Experience signals, which also include HTTPS, safe browsing, and mobile usability. Core Web Vitals are the ones you can most directly control and improve. Why your clients' scores may still be poor Core Web Vitals scores vary dramatically by platform, hosting, and how a site was built. Some of the most common culprits agencies encounter: Heavy above-the-fold content . A homepage with an autoplay video, a full-width image slider, and a chat widget loading simultaneously will fail LCP every time. The browser has to resolve all of those resources before it can paint the largest element. Unstable image dimensions . When an image loads without defined width and height attributes, the browser doesn't reserve space for it. It renders the surrounding text, then jumps it down when the image appears. That jump is CLS. Third-party scripts blocking the main thread . Analytics pixels, ad tags, and live chat tools run on the browser's main thread. When they stack up, every click and tap has to wait in line — driving INP scores up. A single slow third-party script can push an otherwise clean site into "needs improvement" territory. Too many web fonts . Each font family and weight is a separate network request. A page loading four font files before rendering any text will fail LCP, especially on mobile connections. Unoptimized images . JPEGs and PNGs served at full resolution, without compression or modern formats like WebP or AVIF, add unnecessary weight to every page load. How to measure them accurately There are two types of Core Web Vitals data you should be looking at for every client: Lab data comes from tools like Google PageSpeed Insights, Lighthouse, and WebPageTest. It simulates page loads in controlled conditions. Lab data is useful for diagnosing specific issues and testing fixes before you deploy them. Field data (also called Real User Monitoring, or RUM) comes from actual users visiting the site. Google collects this through the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) and surfaces it in Search Console and PageSpeed Insights. Field data is what Google actually uses as a ranking signal — and it often looks worse than lab data because it reflects real-world device and connection variability. If your client's site has enough traffic, you'll see field data in Search Console under Core Web Vitals. This is your baseline. Lab data helps you understand why the scores are what they are. For clients with low traffic who don't have enough field data to appear in CrUX, you'll be working primarily with lab scores. Set that expectation early so clients understand that improvements may not immediately show up in Search Console. Practical fixes that move the needle Fix LCP: get the hero image loading first The single most effective LCP improvement is adding fetchpriority="high" to the hero image tag. This tells the browser to prioritize that resource over everything else. If you're using a background CSS image for the hero, switch it to anelement — background images aren't discoverable by the browser's preload scanner. Also check whether your hosting serves images through a CDN with caching. Edge delivery dramatically reduces the time-to-first-byte, which feeds directly into LCP. Fix CLS: define dimensions for every media element Every image, video, and ad slot on the page needs explicit width and height attributes in the HTML. If you're using responsive CSS, you can still define the aspect ratio with aspect-ratio in CSS while leaving the actual size fluid. The key is giving the browser enough information to reserve space before the asset loads. Avoid inserting content above existing content after page load. This is common with cookie banners, sticky headers that change height, and dynamically loaded ad units. If you need to show these, anchor them to fixed positions so they don't push content around. Fix INP: reduce what's competing for the main thread Audit third-party scripts and defer or remove anything that isn't essential. Tools like WebPageTest's waterfall view or Chrome DevTools Performance panel show you exactly which scripts are blocking the main thread and for how long. Load chat widgets, analytics, and ad tags asynchronously and after the page's critical path has resolved. For most clients, moving non-essential scripts to load after the DOMContentLoaded event is a meaningful INP improvement with no visible impact on the user experience. For websites with heavy JavaScript — particularly those built on frameworks with large client-side bundles — consider breaking up long tasks into smaller chunks using the browser's Scheduler API or simply splitting components so the main thread isn't locked for more than 50 milliseconds at a stretch. What platforms handle automatically One of the practical advantages of building on a platform optimized for performance is that many of these fixes are applied by default. Duda, for example, automatically serves WebP images, lazy loads below-the-fold content, minifies CSS, and uses efficient cache policies for static assets. As of May 2025, 82% of sites built on Duda pass all three Core Web Vitals metrics — the highest recorded pass rate among major website platforms. That baseline matters when you're managing dozens or hundreds of client sites. It means you're starting each project close to or at a passing score, rather than diagnosing and patching a broken foundation. How much do Core Web Vitals actually affect rankings? Honestly, they're a tiebreaker — not a primary signal. Google has been clear that content quality and relevance still dominate ranking decisions. A well-optimized site with thin, irrelevant content won't outrank a content-rich competitor just because its CLS is 0.05. What Core Web Vitals do affect is the user experience that supports those rankings. Pages with poor LCP scores have measurably higher bounce rates. Sites with high CLS lose users mid-session. Those behavioral signals — time on page, return visits, conversions — are things search engines can observe and incorporate. The practical argument for fixing Core Web Vitals isn't just "because Google said so." It's that faster, more stable pages convert better. Every second of LCP improvement can reduce bounce rates by 15–20% depending on the industry and device mix. For client sites that monetize through leads or eCommerce, that's a revenue argument, not just an SEO argument. A repeatable process for agencies Audit every new site before launch. Run PageSpeed Insights and record LCP, INP, and CLS scores for both mobile and desktop. Flag anything in the "needs improvement" or "poor" range before the client sees the live site. Check Search Console monthly for existing clients. The Core Web Vitals report surfaces issues as they appear in field data. Catching a regression early — before it compounds — is significantly easier than explaining a traffic drop after the fact. Document what you've improved. Clients rarely see Core Web Vitals scores on their own. A monthly one-page performance summary showing before/after scores builds credibility and makes your technical work visible. Prioritize mobile. Google uses mobile-first indexing, and field data shows that mobile CWV scores are almost always worse than desktop. If you only have time to optimize one version, do mobile first. Core Web Vitals aren't a one-time fix. Platforms change, new scripts get added, campaigns bring in new widgets. Build the audit into your workflow and treat it like any other ongoing deliverable, and you'll stay ahead of the issues before they affect your clients' rankings. Duda's platform is built with Core Web Vitals performance in mind. Explore how it handles image optimization, script management, and site speed automatically — so your team spends less time debugging and more time building.
By Ilana Brudo March 31, 2026
Vertical SaaS must transition from tools to an AI-powered Vertical Operating System (vOS). Learn to leverage context, end tech sprawl, and maximize retention.
By Shawn Davis March 27, 2026
Automate client management, instant site generation, and data synchronization with an API-driven website builder to create a scalable growth engine for your SaaS platform.
Show More

Latest posts